I came across an article called “Feeding Hungry Minds” in Canadian Living, November 2007 edition, that gave me some interesting insight into major problems facing Canadian parents and educators.
In the past, school breakfast and lunch programs have been seen as charity endeavours, meant to improve the learning abilities and attention span of children suffering from poverty. While in the past, this program may have fulfilled a much needed demand in Canadian schools, this need is changing and expanding. The article states that “the philosophy of feeding children in school has evolved to meet the changing needs of Canadian families”. While lunch programs do address child poverty, there is a growing need for schools to address the overall nutrition of all students. With the norm being two parents working full-time jobs, kids are often responsible for packing their own lunches, or parents simply rely on packing unhealthy pre-packaged foods for snacks and lunches. Additionally, school facilities are still built to be incapable of housing large amount of students for lunch, cramping them in classrooms, hallways, and gyms where there is little supervision of what kids are eating, much less providing them with a comfortable space to enjoy a well-balanced meal. The article sheds light on this issue, saying that we need to realize that the “1950s mom-will-pick-up-the-kids-for-lunch mentality” is no longer a reality for most families.
The article goes on to connect school nutrition programs with child obesity. Studies revealed that children with a fully-integrated nutrition program had the lowest rates of obesity and also had positive effects on school community, health of students, and levelling out differences between the socio-economic status of students in the school. The article suggests that school nutrition programs become possible with parent and community volunteers, food donations, additional funding, and monetary contributions by parents able to pay for their child’s lunches.
While some may see nutrition programs as an additional expense for both parents and the system, a well-balanced, hot meal may be provided for as little as $3.00 a day, often less than what parents would spend on the lunch they send to school with their children, especially with so many kids eating out of vending machines or confectionaries throughout the day. It seems to me that while this ideal may take time to become fully integrated in our schools, it is definitely a goal to work towards. School nutrition programs have benefits for all children — working against the extremes of both obesity and child hunger, as well as meeting the needs of a changing society.